34th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Neuroimmunology (JSNI)

The proceedings contain 14 papers. The topics discussed include: MOG-positive anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis with no demyelinating lesions: two case reports;safety and tolerability of rozanolixizumab in the randomized phase 3 MycarinG study;Outcomes from RAISE: A randomized, phase 3 trial of zilucoplan in generalized myasthenia gravis;efficacy and safety of zilucoplan in myasthenia gravis: responder analysis from the randomized Phase 3 RAISE trial;distinct effects among calcium-binding proteins for microglia to produce chemokines associated with the clinical severity of ALS;astroglial connexin 43 is a novel therapeutic target for a chronic multiple sclerosis model;targeting lymphocytes in SPMS: Th cell populations as a biomarker to predict the efficacy of Siponimod;CSF lysophospholipids as a novel biomarker in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis;the immune response to SARS-COV-2 MRNA vaccines in siponimod-treated patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis;patient characteristics of siponimod-treated SPMS patients in Japan: interim results from post-marketing surveillance;and efficacy of ravulizumab across sex and age subgroups of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: a post hoc analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome in the setting of COVID-19 successfully treated with complement inhibition therapy: An instructive case report of a previously healthy toddler and review of literature.

Introduction: As the global pandemic continues, new complications of COVID-19 in pediatric population have turned up, one of them being hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA) characterized by triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and acute kidney injury (AKI). With both multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and HUS sharing complement dysregulation as one of the key factors, the aim of this case report is to highlight differences between these two conditions and also emphasize the importance of complement blockade as a treatment modality. Case report: We describe a 21-month-old toddler who initially presented with fever and confirmed COVID-19. His condition quickly deteriorated and he developed oliguria, accompanied with diarrhea, vomiting and oral intake intolerance. HUS was suspected, supported with compelling laboratory findings, including decreased platelets count and C3 levels, elevated LDH, urea, serum creatinine and sC5b-9 and presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood, negative fecal Shiga toxin and normal ADAMTS13 metalloprotease activity. The patient was given C5 complement blocker Ravulizumab and started to display rapid improvement. Conclusion: Although reports of HUS in the setting of COVID-19 continue to pour in, the questions of exact mechanism and similarities to MIS-C remain. Our case for the first time accentuates the use of complement blockade as a valuable treatment option in this scenario. We sincerely believe that reporting on HUS as a complication of COVID-19 in children will give rise to improved diagnosis and treatment, as well as better understanding of both of these intricating diseases.

Phase 3 Study of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Ravulizumab in Eculizumab-Experienced Adult Patients with PNH: Primary Analysis and 1-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the ravulizumab on-body delivery system for subcutaneous (SUBQ) administration with intravenous (IV) ravulizumab in eculizumab-experienced patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). METHODS: Patients with PNH received SUBQ ravulizumab (n = 90) or IV ravulizumab (n = 46) during the 10-week randomized treatment period; all patients then received SUBQ ravulizumab during an extension period (< 172 weeks; data cutoff 1 year). Primary endpoint was day 71 serum ravulizumab trough concentration (Ctrough). Secondary endpoints were ravulizumab Ctrough and free C5 over time. Efficacy endpoints included change in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), transfusion avoidance, stabilized hemoglobin, and Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (TASQ) score. Safety, including adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs), was assessed until data cutoff. RESULTS: SUBQ ravulizumab demonstrated PK non-inferiority with IV ravulizumab (day 71 SUBQ/IV geometric least-squares means ratio 1.257 [90% confidence interval 1.160-1.361; p < 0.0001]). Through 1 year of SUBQ administration, ravulizumab Ctrough values were > 175 µg/mL (PK threshold) and free C5 < 0.5 µg/mL (PD threshold). Efficacy endpoints remained stable: mean (standard deviation, SD) LDH percentage change was 0.9% (20.5%); BTH events, 5/128 patients (3.9%); 83.6% achieved transfusion avoidance; 79.7% achieved stabilized hemoglobin. Total TASQ score showed improved satisfaction with SUBQ ravulizumab compared with IV eculizumab (mean [SD] change at SUBQ day 351, - 69.3 [80.1]). The most common AEs during SUBQ treatment (excluding ADEs) were headache (14.1%), COVID-19 (14.1%), and pyrexia (10.9%); the most common ADE unrelated to a device product issue was injection site reaction (4.7%). Although many patients had ≥ 1 device issue-related ADE, full SUBQ dose administration was achieved in 99.9% of attempts. CONCLUSIONS: SUBQ ravulizumab provides an additional treatment choice for patients with PNH. Patients may switch to SUBQ ravulizumab from IV eculizumab or ravulizumab without loss of efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03748823.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by the destruction of red blood cells (hemolysis) within blood vessels. In addition to hemolysis, patients with PNH are susceptible to life-threatening blood clots (thromboses). Eculizumab and ravulizumab are types of treatments for PNH, called C5 inhibitors. In the blood, these treatments bind to C5 protein and prevent the destruction of red blood cells, reducing the symptoms and complications of PNH. Both treatments are approved for use via intravenous (through the vein) administration. Ravulizumab is also approved in the USA for use via subcutaneous (under the skin) administration. This study compared subcutaneous ravulizumab with intravenous ravulizumab in patients with PNH who had previously been treated with eculizumab. During the initial treatment period of 71 days, 90 patients received subcutaneous ravulizumab and 46 received intravenous ravulizumab. Following this period, all patients received subcutaneous ravulizumab. At day 71, the amount of ravulizumab in the blood of patients taking subcutaneous ravulizumab was no less than in patients taking intravenous ravulizumab and was maintained over 1 year of treatment. Efficacy measures (how well it works) remained stable in patients taking subcutaneous ravulizumab for 1 year and side effects were comparable with those of intravenous ravulizumab. Patients reported more satisfaction with subcutaneous ravulizumab than intravenous eculizumab, as assessed by the Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire. This study showed that patients with PNH can switch from intravenous eculizumab or ravulizumab to subcutaneous ravulizumab without loss of efficacy. Subcutaneous ravulizumab provides an additional treatment choice for patients with PNH.

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper.

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.

EFFICACY, TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION SATISFACTION AND SAFETY OF SUBCUTANEOUS RAVULIZUMAB THROUGH 1 YEAR IN PATIENTS WITH PAROXYSMAL NOCTURNAL HEMOGLOBINURIA WHO RECEIVED PRIOR INTRAVENOUS ECULIZUMAB

Background: The efficacy of ravulizumab (intravenous [IV] formulation;administered every 8 weeks) for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) has been demonstrated in several randomized trials (NCT02946463, NCT03056040, NCT03406507). In study 303 (NCT03748823), subcutaneous (SC) ravulizumab, administered weekly via an on-body delivery system, showed pharmacokinetic non-inferiority to IV ravulizumab in adult patients with PNH who were clinically stable on prior IV eculizumab treatment. Here, we report results from the first 1 year of SC treatment, starting at day 15 for patients who continued SC ravulizumab during the extension period (SC/SC) and day 71 for patients who switched from IV ravulizumab to SC ravulizumab (IV/SC). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy, treatment administration satisfaction and safety of SC ravulizumab through the first 1 year (day 351) of treatment in adult patients with PNH previously treated with eculizumab. Methods: Patients (≥ 18 years) with clinically stable PNH (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] levels ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal [246 U/L]) and ≥ 3 months prior eculizumab treatment were enrolled in the study, which consisted of a screening period (day-1 to day-30), a 10-week randomized treatment period and an extension period of up to 172 weeks. During the randomized treatment period, patients were assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive either SC ravulizumab or IV ravulizumab;all patients received SC ravulizumab during the extension period. Efficacy endpoints included: change in LDH from baseline;incidence of breakthrough hemolysis;transfusion avoidance;and stabilized hemoglobin (avoidance of a ≥ 2 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin in the absence of transfusion). Treatment administration satisfaction was assessed via the Treatment Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (TASQ), which has been validated in a PNH population. Safety, including adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs), were also assessed up to the 1-year data cut-off. Results: In total, 128 patients received SC ravulizumab (SC/SC: n = 84;IV/SC: n = 44;mean [range] duration of SC treatment: 486.4 [37-709] days). Efficacy endpoints (SC/SC and IV/SC) remained stable over time through 1 year of SC ravulizumab treatment. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) percentage change in LDH from baseline to SC day 351 was 0.9% (20.5%). Breakthrough hemolysis events were infrequent: 5/128 patients (3.9%);no event was considered free C5-related. Transfusion avoidance was maintained in 83.6% of patients during SC treatment, and 79.7% achieved stabilized hemoglobin. Improvement in total TASQ score with SC ravulizumab (compared with baseline IV eculizumab) was apparent at the first post-SC treatment assessment (SC day 29) and maintained until data cut-off (Figure). The most common AEs (reported by ≥ 10% of patients, excluding ADEs related to device product issues) during SC treatment were headache (14.1%, all grade ≤ 2), COVID-19 (14.1%, one death) and pyrexia (10.9%);injection site reaction (4.7%) was the most common non-device related ADE. Treatment-emergent SAEs were experienced by 21.1% of patients through to data cut-off. Although many patients had ≥ 1 device issue ADE, full SC dose administration was achieved in 99.9% of attempts. ADE incidence decreased over time. Image: Summary/Conclusion: The SC method of administration provides an additional treatment option for patients with PNH receiving ravulizumab therapy. Patients may be switched from IV eculizumab or IV ravulizumab to SC ravulizumab without loss of efficacy.

TRANSPLANT-ASSOCIATED THROMBOTIC MICROANGIOPATHY SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH RAVULIZUMAB

Background: Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is an increasingly recognized complication of hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) with incidence rates ranging from 10-35%. The predominant mechanism leading to TA-TMA is endothelial cell damage leading to complement dysregulation and microvascular hemolysis. Complement dysregulation is particularly important in the pathophysiology of TA-TMA as initial trials have shown response to complement blockade using eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the terminal complement pathway. Ravulizumab is a longer acting monoclonal antibody with the same target as eculizumab that is increasingly used for treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Herein, we describe the case of an African American female with relapsed/refractory infantile B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who underwent 10/10 HLA-matched sibling donor allogeneic transplant (conditioning: busulfan/fludarabine/thiotepa;GVHD prophylaxis: tacrolimus/methotrexate) who developed TA-TMA marked by pericardial effusion, elevated LDH, proteinuria, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and evidence of microangiopathy. Upon diagnosis, as ravulizumab was on formulary and readily available unlike eculizumab, she was treated with ravulizumab instead of eculizumab. Objectives: To describe the therapeutic response to ravulizumab in one patient diagnosed with TA-TMA. Design/Method: A retrospective chart review was performed regarding this patient's ravulizumab treatment course, and direct discussions were had with the patient's care team. Results: Ravulizumab (loading dose of 600 mg followed 2 weeks later by maintenance dosing of 600 mg every 4 weeks) was administered. Pre-treatment CH50 was >75 U/mL (range: 30-75 U/mL) with sC5b9 and C3 complement levels at the upper limit of normal at 220 ng/mL (range: ≤244 ng/mL) and 143 mg/dL (range: 72-164 mg/dL), respectively. Clinical normalization of the patient's TA-TMA was achieved two weeks after loading dose administration with normalization of LDH and blood pressure values, improved proteinuria, decreased transfusion requirements, absence of schistocytes on peripheral smear, and complete resolution of pericardial effusion. A total of 5 maintenance doses of ravulizumab were administered approximately every 4 weeks with CH50 ranging <3-33 U/mL during this time period. Five maintenance doses were administered as the optimal duration was unknown and the patient's TA-TMA treatment course was complicated by COVID-19 infection, for which there was concern could lead to TA-TMA reactivation (which did not occur). The ravulizumab was well tolerated throughout with amoxicillin used for meningococcal prophylaxis. Conclusion: While studies evaluating ravulizumab for treatment of TA-TMA are ongoing, ravulizumab successfully led to complement blockade and clinical improvement in this patient with TA-TMA.

Cholecystectomy in a patient with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria undergoing ravulizumab maintenance treatment.

A 47-year-old male with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) controlled with routine ravulizumab administration suffered a massive haemolytic crisis due to choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed 6 weeks after a regular ravulizumab infusion. After surgery, the patient presented with anaemia without marked elevation in lactate dehydrogenase and required two blood transfusions. Tumour necrosis factor-α increased more than twofold with reticulocyte suppression after surgery, suggesting the involvement of myelosuppressive cytokines. This case suggests that laparoscopic surgery may be safely performed in patients with PNH receiving ravulizumab maintenance treatment. However, attention should be paid to postoperative anaemia, regardless of breakthrough haemolysis.

Sars-Cov-2 Vaccination in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: An Italian Multicenter Survey

SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination have raised concerns in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). In fact, PNH patients carry an increased infectious risk secondary to complement inhibition treatment or associated bone marrow failure (BMF), and may therefore benefit from preventive strategies such as vaccinations. On the contrary, vaccines can be numbered among inflammatory complement amplifiers (e.g., infections, traumas, surgery), potentially triggering a disease exacerbation. In PNH patients on complement inhibitors, this phenomenon has been defined pharmacodynamic breakthrough hemolysis (BTH). Based on isolated reports of BTH following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we conducted a survey among 5 Italian reference centers to evaluate complications and BTH occurrence in PNH patients who completed the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule from January, 2 2021 until the time of writing. Adverse events, hematologic and hemolytic parameters were recorded within 7-10 days before and after each dose of vaccine. A total of 67 patients (females/males 43/24, median age 47.6 years, range 21-90.5) were eligible for the analysis. According to the International PNH Interest Group classification, 45 patients suffered from hemolytic PNH, 20 from PNH in the context of BMF syndromes (aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndrome), and 2 from subclinical PNH. Fifty-five subjects (82%) were on regular complement inhibition therapy, i.e., eculizumab (N=35), ravulizumab (N=13), subcutaneous anti-C5 (N=3), anti-factor B (N=2) and ravulizumab + anti-factor D combination (N=2). Vaccines (Comirnaty/Pfizer-BioNTech N=53, mRNA-1273/Moderna N=12, and ChAdOx1 nCov-19/AstraZeneca N=2) were complessively well-tolerated, with 3 non-hematologic adverse events after the first dose (2 fever and 1 exercise-induced tachycardia, grade 1 according to CTCAE v5.0) and 2 after the second one (fever, accompanied by vomit in one patient, grade 1). During the observation period, 3 BTH and 1 hemolytic exacerbation were recorded (5.9% of patients), as detailed in Table 1. The most severe episode occurred in a young woman (Patient 3) on subcutaneous ravulizumab who experienced a hemoglobin (Hb) drop >2 g/dL, marked clinical signs of intravascular hemolysis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase >1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) from baseline, which is considered a clinical BTH according to the criteria proposed by the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. The patient required hospitalization for additional treatment with recombinant erythropoietin and anti-thombotic/bacterial prophylaxis. The second more severe BTH was registered in a male patient (Patient 1) on oral anti-factor B who experienced a Hb drop >2 g/dL without an overt hemolytic flare, and required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy (concomitant urinary tract infection). The remaining two patients experienced a subclinical BTH (Patient 2) and a hemolytic flare (Patient 4, not on complement inhibition). On the whole, a median delta variation from usual values of Hb and LDH of -25% (range -26+3%) and +80% (+18+105%) were observed, respectively. Of note, 3 episodes occurred after the second dose of vaccine, generally within 24-48 hours. Anti-complement drugs were not modified/discontinued in any of the 3 patients on regular treatment. Patients not experiencing BTH (94.1%) showed stable hematologic parameters after the first dose (Hb/LDH median delta variations from baseline -1%/+1%, range -14+12%/-32+40%) and the second dose of vaccine (Hb/LDH median delta variations from baseline +1%/0%, range -18+47%/-76+41%). Of note, 4 patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection completed the vaccination without any complication/PNH exacerbation. In conclusion, this survey shows that BTH/hemolytic flares following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are observed in about 6% of PNH patients, may be clinically relevant but manageable, and should not discourage vaccination. BTH has been registered mostly few days after the second dose of vaccine, suggesting a “booster⠝ effect favoring a higher inflammatory response. Watchful clinical and laboratory monitoring is advised, in order to promptly recognize severe hemolytic flares in both treated and naïve patients. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Fattizzo: Novartis: Speakers Bureau;Kira: Speakers Bureau;Alexion: Speakers Bureau;Annexon: Consultancy;Momenta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Apellis: Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bianchi: Agios pharmaceutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sica: Jazz Pharma: Consultancy;Alexion: Consultancy. Barcellini: Novartis: Other: Invited speaker, Research Funding;Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Invited speaker, Research Funding;Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ravulizumab in Adults with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Terminal complement amplification is hypothesized to be a key contributor to the clinical manifestations of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ravulizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to complement protein C5 and inhibits terminal complement activation, is being evaluated as a treatment for COVID-19-related severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome in an ongoing phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ALXN1210-COV-305). To address the overactivation of terminal complement in severe COVID-19 compared to the diseases in which ravulizumab is currently approved, a modified dosing regimen was adopted. This analysis evaluates preliminary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data to confirm the modified dosing regimen. METHODS: Weight-based ravulizumab doses were administered on days 1, 5, 10, and 15. Serum levels of ravulizumab and free C5 were measured before and after administration of ravulizumab and any time on day 22. Free C5 levels < 0.5 µg/mL indicate complete C5 inhibition. The pharmacokinetic target was defined as ravulizumab concentrations at the end of the dosing interval > 175 µg/mL, the concentration above which C5 is completely inhibited. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in this evaluation. At baseline, mean C5 concentration was 240 ± 67 µg/mL. In all patients and at all individual timepoints after the first dose was administered, ravulizumab concentrations remained > 175 µg/mL and free C5 concentrations remained < 0.5 µg/mL. CONCLUSION: High levels of baseline C5 observed in patients with severe COVID-19 contribute to the growing body of evidence that suggests this disease is marked by amplification of terminal complement activation. Data from this preliminary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of 22 patients with severe COVID-19 show that the modified ravulizumab dosing regimen achieved immediate and complete terminal complement inhibition, which can be sustained for up to 22 days. These data support the continued use of this dosage regimen in the ongoing phase 3 study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04369469.

While many people have no or mild COVID-19 symptoms, a small number of people become very sick and require hospitalization in intensive care units. One part of their immune system, known as complement, overreacts and attacks the lungs and other organs. Researchers are looking for a way to keep the immune system from attacking the body instead of protecting it. Ravulizumab is a medication currently used to do this in other diseases. Ravulizumab is being studied to see if it can reduce the destructive and deadly effects of the coronavirus infection. In this evaluation, ravulizumab effectively reduced complement in patients with severe COVID-19.

A Phase 3 Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenously Administered Ravulizumab Compared with Best Supportive Care in Patients with COVID-19 Severe Pneumonia, Acute Lung Injury, or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Primary Objective • To evaluate the effect of ravulizumab, a long-acting complement (C5) inhibitor plus best supportive care (BSC) compared with BSC alone on the survival of patients with COVID-19. Secondary Objectives • Number of days free of mechanical ventilation at Day 29 • Duration of intensive care unit stay at Day 29 • Change from baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at Day 29 • Change from baseline in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation/ fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2 /FiO2) at Day 29 • Duration of hospitalization at Day 29 • Survival (based on all-cause mortality) at Day 60 and Day 90 Safety • Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-emergent serious adverse events. PK/PD/Immunogenicity • Change in serum ravulizumab concentrations over time • Change in serum free and total C5 concentrations over time • Incidence and titer of anti-ALXN1210 antibodies Biomarkers • Change in absolute level of soluble biomarkers in blood associated with complement activation, inflammatory processes, and hypercoagulable states over time Exploratory • Incidence of progression to renal failure requiring dialysis at Day 29 • Time to clinical improvement (based on a modified 6-point ordinal scale) over 29 days • SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores at Day 29 (or discharge), Day 60, and Day 90 • EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) scores at Day 29 (or discharge), Day 60, and Day 90 TRIAL DESIGN: This is a multicenter Phase 3, open-label, randomized, controlled, study. The study is being conducted in acute care hospital settings in the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, France, Germany, and Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Male or female patients at least 18 years of age, weighing ≥ 40 kg, admitted to a designated hospital facility for treatment will be screened for eligibility in this study. Key Inclusion criteria • Confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (eg, via polymerase chain reaction [PCR] and/or antibody test) presenting as severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization • Severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, or ARDS confirmed by computed tomography (CT) or X-ray at Screening or within the 3 days prior to Screening, as part of the patient's routine clinical care • Respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation, which can be either invasive (requiring endotracheal intubation) or non-invasive (with continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] or bilevel positive airway pressure [BiPAP]) Key Exclusion criteria • Patient is not expected to survive for more than 24 hours • Patient is on invasive mechanical ventilation with intubation for more than 48 hours prior to Screening • Severe pre-existing cardiac disease (ie, NYHA Class 3 or Class 4, acute coronary syndrome, or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias) • Patient has an unresolved Neisseria meningitidis infection Excluded medications and therapies • Current treatment with a complement inhibitor • Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 4 weeks prior to randomization on Day 1 Excluded prior/concurrent clinical study experience • Treatment with investigational therapy in a clinical study within 30 days before randomization, or within 5 half-lives of that investigational therapy, whichever is greater • Exceptions a. Investigational therapies will be allowed if received as part of best supportive care through an expanded access protocol or emergency approval for the treatment of COVID-19. b. Investigational antiviral therapies (such as remdesivir) will be allowed even if received as part of a clinical study. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: The study consists of a Screening Period of up to 3 days, a Primary Evaluation Period of 4 weeks, a final assessment at Day 29, and a Follow-up Period of 8 weeks. For patients randomized to ravulizumab plus BSC, a weight-based dose of ravulizumab (≥40 to < 60 kg/2400 mg, 60 to < 100 kg/2700 mg, ≥ 100 kg/3000 mg) will be administered on Day 1. On Day 5 and Day 10, additional doses of 600 mg (≥40 to <60 kg) or 900 mg (>60 kg) ravulizumab will be administered and on Day 15 patients will receive 900 mg ravulizumab. There is no active or placebo comparator in this open-label clinical trial. The total duration of each patient's participation is anticipated to be approximately 3 months. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome of this study is survival (based on all-cause mortality) at Day 29. RANDOMISATION: Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (ravulizumab plus BSC:BSC alone). Randomization will be stratified by intubated or not intubated on Day 1. Computer-generated randomization lists will be prepared by a third party under the direction of the sponsor. Investigators, or designees, will enrol patients and then obtain randomization codes using an interactive voice/web response system. The block size will be kept concealed so that investigators cannot select patients for a particular treatment assignment. Blinding (masking): This is an open-label study. Numbers to be randomised (sample size): Approximately 270 patients will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to ravulizumab plus BSC (n=180) or BSC alone (n=90). TRIAL STATUS: Protocol Number: ALXN1210-COV-305 Original Protocol: 09 Apr 2020 Protocol Amendment 1 (Global): 13 Apr 2020 Protocol Amendment 2 (Global): 17 Apr 2020 Protocol Amendment 3 (Global): 09 Jun 2020 Recruitment is currently ongoing. Recruitment was initiated on 11 May 2020. We expect recruitment to be completed by 30 Nov 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: Protocol Registry Number: NCT04369469 ; First posted; 30 Apr 2020 EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT Number: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=ALXN1210-COV-305 , Start date: 07 May 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full redacted protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Repurposed immunomodulatory drugs for Covid-19 in pre-ICu patients - mulTi-Arm Therapeutic study in pre-ICu patients admitted with Covid-19 - Repurposed Drugs (TACTIC-R): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a specific immunomodulatory intervention reduces progression of COVID-19-related disease to organ failure or death, compared to standard of care (SoC). TRIAL DESIGN: Randomised, parallel 3-arm (1:1:1 ratio), open-label, Phase IV platform trial of immunomodulatory therapies in patients with late stage 1 or stage 2 COVID-19-related disease, with a diagnosis based either on a positive assay or high suspicion of COVID-19 infection by clinical and/or radiological assessment. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 and over, with a clinical picture strongly suggestive of COVID-19-related disease (with/without a positive COVID-19 test) AND a Risk count (as defined below) >3 OR ≥3 if risk count includes "Radiographic severity score >3". A risk count is calculated by the following features on admission (1 point for each): radiographic severity score >3, male gender, non-white ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, neutrophils >8.0 x109/L, age >40 years and CRP >40 mg/L. Patients should be considered an appropriate subject for intervention with immunomodulatory therapies in the opinion of the investigator and be able to be maintained on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during the inpatient dosing period, according to local guidelines. The complete inclusion and exclusion criteria as detailed in the additional file 1 should be fulfilled. Patients will be enrolled prior to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, cardiac or renal support. Participants will be recruited across multiple centres including initially at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital of Wales, Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Each active comparator arm will be compared against standard of care (SoC). The immunomodulatory drugs were selected from a panel of licenced candidates by a drug evaluation committee, which considered potential efficacy, potential toxicity, scalability and novelty of each strategy. The initial active arms comprise baricitinib and ravulizumab. Baricitinib will be given 4 mg orally (once daily (OD)) on days 1-14 or until day of discharge. The dose will be reduced to 2 mg OD for patients aged > 75 years and those with an estimated Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance of 30-60 ml/min. Ravulizumab will be administered intravenously once according to the licensed weight-based dosing regimen (see Additional file 1). Each active arm will be compared with standard of care alone. No comparisons will be made between active arms in this platform trial. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the incidence (from baseline up to Day 14) of any one of the events (whichever comes first): death, invasive mechanical ventilation, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiovascular organ support (inotropes or balloon pump), or renal failure (estimated Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance <15ml/min). RANDOMISATION: Eligible patients will be randomised using a central web-based randomisation service (Sealed Envelope) in a 1:1:1 ratio, stratified by site to one of the treatment arms or SoC. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label trial. Data analysis will not be blinded. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): There is no fixed sample size for this study. Serial interim analyses will be triggered by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), including analysis after 125 patients are recruited to each arm, 375 in total assuming 3 arms. Additional interim analyses are projected after 229 patients per arm, and potentially then after 469 per arm, but additional analyses may be triggered by the IDMC. TRIAL STATUS: TACTIC-R Protocol version number 2.0 date May 20, 2020, recruitment began May 7, 2020 and the end trial will be the date 18 months after the last patient's last visit. The recruitment end date cannot yet be accurately predicted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number: 2020-001354-22 Registered: 6 May 2020 It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04390464 ) and on ISRCTN (ISRCTN11188345) FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.